Should the CPORT Be Used for CSAM Risk Assessment?
Analysis of a meta-study trying to validate the forensic use of the Child Pornography Offender Risk Tool (CPORT) for actuarial CSAM risk assessment.
Analysis of a meta-study trying to validate the forensic use of the Child Pornography Offender Risk Tool (CPORT) for actuarial CSAM risk assessment.
It has been known for quite some time that there are two categories of CSAM offenders, internet-only and mixed offenders.
Beyond the standard actuarial testing, can these other studies help predict recidivism? How do these scores affect treatment needs?
What are the findings of the multi-year, state government-funded report of the PA Task Force on Child Pornography? And what are its recommendations?
What works best for treating sexually violent persons in civil commitment programs? Results from both treatment providers and patients.
Using the Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) scale and two risk assessment measures to look at likelihood of completion of treatment and reducing the risk of recidivism.
A look at the data and results of an August 2022 study of 141 sexual offenders. The study further emphasizes the CPORT’s predictions of recidivism.
Do psychopathic indicators remain past adolescence or are they shed through the maturing process?
In this meta-analysis, the authors explain where the PPG excels and under what circumstances it falls short for predicting recidivism. This is a very important study if you are defending or evaluating a client whose crime is against a child.
How does it differ from straight, cisgender individuals?