What Risk Assessment Tools Can You Use for CSEM Cases?
CSAM cases continue to proliferate, the question remains: What risk assessment measures can be used for cases without co-occuring contact offending behaviors?
CSAM cases continue to proliferate, the question remains: What risk assessment measures can be used for cases without co-occuring contact offending behaviors?
There has been disappointingly little research performed on Upskirting, however a new review is shedding light on the topic.
Analysis of a meta-study trying to validate the forensic use of the Child Pornography Offender Risk Tool (CPORT) for actuarial CSAM risk assessment.
It has been known for quite some time that there are two categories of CSAM offenders, internet-only and mixed offenders.
Beyond the standard actuarial testing, can these other studies help predict recidivism? How do these scores affect treatment needs?
What are the findings of the multi-year, state government-funded report of the PA Task Force on Child Pornography? And what are its recommendations?
What works best for treating sexually violent persons in civil commitment programs? Results from both treatment providers and patients.
Using the Adverse Childhood Experiences scale and 2 risk assessment measures to evaluate treatment completion and reduce recidivism with trauma informed care.
A look at the data and results of an August 2022 study of 141 sexual offenders. The study further emphasizes the recidivism prediction abilities of the CPORT.
Do psychopathic indicators remain past adolescence or are they shed through the maturing process? How does this impact sentencing?