Comparing the Static-99R and CPORT
There is a prevalence of Child Sexual Abuse Materials cases and no fully validated risk assessment measure for these cases. Looking at the Static-99R and CPORT.
There is a prevalence of Child Sexual Abuse Materials cases and no fully validated risk assessment measure for these cases. Looking at the Static-99R and CPORT.
Research on recidivism tools for women lags significantly behind that on men. Additionally, it is further limited by lack of research on mental health.
CSAM cases continue to proliferate, the question remains: What risk assessment measures can be used for cases without co-occuring contact offending behaviors?
There has been disappointingly little research performed on Upskirting, however a new review is shedding light on the topic.
Analysis of a meta-study trying to validate the forensic use of the Child Pornography Offender Risk Tool (CPORT) for actuarial CSAM risk assessment.
It has been known for quite some time that there are two categories of CSAM offenders, internet-only and mixed offenders.
Beyond the standard actuarial testing, can these other studies help predict recidivism? How do these scores affect treatment needs?
What are the findings of the multi-year, state government-funded report of the PA Task Force on Child Pornography? And what are its recommendations?
What works best for treating sexually violent persons in civil commitment programs? Results from both treatment providers and patients.
Using the Adverse Childhood Experiences scale and 2 risk assessment measures to evaluate treatment completion and reduce recidivism with trauma informed care.