CPORT Does Not Pass Cross Cultural Validation
How does the CPORT miss the mark in properly predicting recidivism rates?
Research on forensic risk assessment, actuarial and structured tools, protective factors, recidivism, reoffending, and desistance.
How does the CPORT miss the mark in properly predicting recidivism rates?
The implications of race and utilizing the Static-99R for assessing risk in sentencing.
What steps should be taken to ensure an offender that is under investigation should be placed in the lowest recidivism risk category?
What data is available to assess and determine the likelihood of a female sexual offender being arrested, charged, convicted, or incarcerated after her initial conviction?
An analysis of the recidivism rates of female sexual offenders and likely factors that would increase risk of reoffense.
Analyzing a Federal Probation report on recidivism rates of child pornography sexual offenders with and without prior offenses as it relates to risk assessment.
Does the male dominated Static-99R apply satisfactorily to female sexual offenders? If not, what validated actuarial risk assessments exist for this population?
Data driven look at 5-year and newly available 10-year data points on recidivism of both contact and non-contact sexual offenders using the Static-99R.
Identifying the requirements to accurately assess residual risk with declining data points of desistance and recidivism in post release sexual offenders.
Evaluating a study that shows sex offender risk of recidivism post release and how it relates to sentence mitigation, aggravation, and public policy.