Does the SAPROF-SO Predict Recidivism Risk?
What level of accuracy does the SAPROF-SO provide for predicting recidivism as compared to other, validated assessments? A look at a 170 sample study.
Research on forensic risk assessment, actuarial and structured tools, protective factors, recidivism, reoffending, and desistance.
What level of accuracy does the SAPROF-SO provide for predicting recidivism as compared to other, validated assessments? A look at a 170 sample study.
CSAM Offending meta-analysis (2025) updates recidivism rates: low official reoffense, higher self-report, and key CSAM-only vs mixed differences.
Does the Static-99R or the MnSOST-R accurately predict recidivism in individuals with Intellectual Disabilities or Borderline Intellectual Functioning?
There is a prevalence of Child Sexual Abuse Materials cases and no fully validated risk assessment measure for these cases. Looking at the Static-99R and CPORT.
Research on recidivism tools for women lags significantly behind that on men. Additionally, it is further limited by lack of research on mental health.
CSAM cases continue to proliferate, the question remains: What risk assessment measures can be used for cases without co-occuring contact offending behaviors?
A study to set a baseline for incestuous sexual offenders for evaluations and risk assessments using a community sample of fathers from North America.
Analysis of a meta-study trying to validate the forensic use of the Child Pornography Offender Risk Tool (CPORT) for actuarial CSAM risk assessment.
It has been known for quite some time that there are two categories of CSAM offenders, internet-only and mixed offenders.
Beyond the standard actuarial testing, can these other studies help predict recidivism? How do these scores affect treatment needs?