Comparing the Static-99R and CPORT
There is a prevalence of Child Sexual Abuse Materials cases and no fully validated risk assessment measure for these cases. Looking at the Static-99R and CPORT.
There is a prevalence of Child Sexual Abuse Materials cases and no fully validated risk assessment measure for these cases. Looking at the Static-99R and CPORT.
Research on recidivism tools for women lags significantly behind that on men. Additionally, it is further limited by lack of research on mental health.
CSAM cases continue to proliferate, the question remains: What risk assessment measures can be used for cases without co-occuring contact offending behaviors?
A study to set a baseline for incestuous sexual offenders for evaluations and risk assessments using a community sample of fathers from North America.
Analysis of a meta-study trying to validate the forensic use of the Child Pornography Offender Risk Tool (CPORT) for actuarial CSAM risk assessment.
It has been known for quite some time that there are two categories of CSAM offenders, internet-only and mixed offenders.
Beyond the standard actuarial testing, can these other studies help predict recidivism? How do these scores affect treatment needs?
In this meta-analysis, the authors explain where the PPG excels and under what circumstances it falls short for predicting recidivism.
What benefit can using a dynamic risk assessment in conjunction with the standard static assessments provide?
What are the most frequent ACE items endorsed by sexually violent persons and can they be used as predictors for recidivism?